Home FAQs PRT FAQs answered by Dr Ed Anderson Will the visual impact of PRT be acceptable?
Will the visual impact of PRT be acceptable? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Saturday, 10 February 2007 08:41

Visual impact is important in all transit systems. Many rail transit systems are placed underground because a ground-level system requires destruction of too much existing property and an elevated system is too massive and noisy. A PRT guideway has less than five percent of the cross sectional area of a rapid rail system, will generate almost no noise, and has an external appearance that can be varied to suit any specific community. According to one famous sculptor, PRT adds excitement and grandeur to the urban scene, both for what it is and what it does.

People accept elevated structures if they see them as a practical means to a desired end. In the early 1970s, when conventional heavy rail systems were being promoted, officials argued that elevated structures were acceptable. The People Movers proposed in the late 1970s had massive structures (witness the Detroit and Miami People Movers) but local authorities considered them acceptable because they were believed to fulfill a need. Taxi 2000 will have much smaller visual impact and will provide much better service at lower cost.

 

Add comment

COMMENTING POLICY
You are welcome to add comments to the material published on our site. Your comments can be helpful in addressing the objectives of this site - namely to promote the awareness of PRT and the uptake of a commercial PRT implementation
We encourage robust, respectful and insightful debate but we will remove any overly abusive comments


Security code
Refresh

© 2012 Personal Rapid Transit in New Zealand - Future Transit Now!
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU General Public License.
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack Joomla Templates