|
|||||||||
|
Dr J E Anderson - Publications DocumentsDate added
The problem of precise longitudinal control of vehicles so that they follow predetermined time-varying speeds and positions has been solved. To control vehicles to the required close headway of at least 0.5 sec, the control philosophy is different from but no less rigorous than that of railroad practice. The preferred control strategy is one that could be called an "asynchronous point follower." Such a strategy requires no clock synchronization, is flexible in all unusual conditions, permits the maximum possible throughput, requires a minimum of maneuvering and uses a minimum of software. Since wayside zone controllers have in their memory exactly the same maneuver equations as the on-board computers, accurate safety monitoring is practical. The paper discusses the functions of vehicle control; the control of station, merge, and diverge zones; and central control.
Courses of Study for Engineers preparing to work on PRT Design. Covers
A comprehensive method for calculating and measuring Dependability of Personal Rapid In PRT systems, vehicle-hours of travel and of delay relate in a statistically simple way to personhours of travel and of delay. Therefore, in such systems, it is practical to use the performance measure called Dependability that takes into account the inconvenience of people as a result of delays. To form a bridge to present practice, it is recommended that both measures be calculated and compared in forthcoming PRT systems. With today's computer systems, this is easily accomplished.
This paper compares the
middle two options among the spectrum listed above. Alternative #3 will be referred to hereinafter as "Single Mode"
or SM. Alternative #4 is called "Dual Mode"
or DM. DM has the advantage over SM for auto drivers that the
same vehicle may be taken for any trip, just as occurs now with one's own
automobile. In many respects, DM is
much like the system envisioned by advocates of alternative #5, an Intelligent
Vehicle Highway System, except that special narrower guideways could be used
for the automated guideway portion of the trip.
The paper reviews the
evolution of the PRT concept from its modern beginning in 1953. The early inventors, the projects, and the
response of government are discussed.
PRT activity diminished to almost nothing by 1980, but then revived
strongly as a result of activity by the Northeastern Illinois Regional
Transportation Authority. Their
interest ignited enthusiastic activity on a growing front to the point that
today one can truly say that the concept is coming of age
View the FAQsWant to know the facts about PRT. Read the PRT FAQs section to get a comprehensive set of responses.
Also take a look at this excellent collection of Q&A at Get On Board PRTs website Get On Board PRT Q&A |