Home
Outside the box solutions needed in economic climate PDF Print E-mail
Written by Will Wilson   

Time for Auckland PRT study

It is easy to be sympathetic to Auckland Council Transport Chairman Mike Lee's recent frustration. Transport MInister Steven Joyce has displayed a less than enthusiastic reaction to the business case for the $2b Auckland central city rail tunnel.

mike_lee_44040dsc_0179-large.jpg

True, at about 3.5km long this amounts to some $570m a kilometre bearing in mind it is tunnelling under CBD. But the benefits have been indicated and it is long overdue. If you are an Aucklander, it is also easy to sympathise with Mike Lee's; threat that if central government do not get this right - to quote

"what comes roaring out of Auckland's underground rail link could end up running down the National Government."

 

The $5m study shows massive benefits for a transit solution with a $2b price tag seeking implementation within 3-5 years. Government has resisted it because on the face of it $2b is a massive price tag and they apparently cannot prioritise this sooner.

 

So, here is the question - isn't it way past time for transit and funding people in both Auckland and Wellington to start thinking outside the box? PRT studies have shown and are still showing costs of about $10m - $15m per kilometre. The nature of PRT light-weight beamways could permit fast deployment - easily within 3 years. For that cost and time frame the whole of CBD could be networked with a world-class transit system. Isn't it time we did the PRT study for Auckland?

The objective of the study should be to show that an equivalent or better solution can be achieved at well below $2b and well within the time-frame. And while they are at it the study should also review a PRT link from Auckland Airport to Manukau City and also a PRT link from CBD over the existing harbour bridge to the North Shore.

And to be clear, a PRT solution does not need to be an "either or" solution - as in either PRT or rail. It should be "both and" and simply part of an overall set of transit solutions for Auckland.

While it is good for Mike Lee and Len Brown to push government hard for funding a decent transit solution for Auckland and to take a "we need it now" approach, in our current economci climate, as they say, "necessity is the mother of invention".

Read Mike Lee's reaction here

Mike Lee image courtesy of City Vision

 

Comments  

 
0 #1 prtnz 2010-12-18 01:37
It will be hard to convince Wellington to shell out short term in this economic climate. Michael Barnett is calling for consideration of busway alternatives for the airport link. Other busway alternatives are being reviewed for the eastern suburbs.

This is understandable in terms of lowering cost (compared to rail) but IMHO it should still be compared to the benefits available with a PRT solution.
Quote
 

Add comment

COMMENTING POLICY
You are welcome to add comments to the material published on our site. Your comments can be helpful in addressing the objectives of this site - namely to promote the awareness of PRT and the uptake of a commercial PRT implementation
We encourage robust, respectful and insightful debate but we will remove any overly abusive comments


Security code
Refresh

© 2013 Personal Rapid Transit in New Zealand - Future Transit Now!
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU General Public License.
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack Joomla Templates